Ma and Pa's Blog

R.I.P. Steve Jobs

Thursday, October 6th, 2011

His vision, through great Apple products, made working, learning, and playing easier and more fun.   Well done.

I <3 my Chromebook.

Sunday, September 11th, 2011

That’s all.

 

Chromebook Review

Sunday, July 10th, 2011

Chromebook:  Pros and Cons after 7-months

Since early December 2010, I’ve been using the prototype Chromebook (Cr-48) provided me by Google.   It’s been fun and, only occasionally, frustrating.   I thought after 7-months, it would be interesting to compare pros and cons to summarize the current state.   My feeling is, prior to beginning this effort, is positive — I’d buy one.   Now, let’s see if I change my own mind.

 

  1. Pros
    • Aesthetics are good. I don’t think I’ve seen a better display or workspace design on a screen this size.   The overall machine is sleek and solid to the touch.   Lacking adornments allows the owner to choose whether he / she wants professional or artistic or whatever look by adding stickers or tattoos to the case.  Personally, flat black is just fine.
    • Battery life is super. I am amazed at how long a charge lasts.  With the Atom processors and solid state disk drive it runs mostly cool and always quiet.  This has to be the greenest computer I’ve ever owned.
    • Maintenance is nil. Updates are handled in background and no extras (anti-virus, anti-spyware, etc.) are needed.   The system can be restored completely from a software image (stored on a 4GB thumb drive) in less than an hour and without losing any data or settings.   Data is stored on the “cloud” (remote web severs) and settings can be synced through Google.   Settings, by the way, are then synced for all computers you use Chrome OS or Chrome web browser on — be they Windows, Mac or Linux machines.  I use all three.
    • Security is good. Should the Chromebook be stolen, all I need do is change my Google password (using another computer or smart phone), and my data is secure.  The exception here would be data stored on an SD card that could be left in the SD reader slot.   I keep this in mind when deciding what I might want to store there.
    • Wifi and Mobile Data Connected. The Cr-48 can connect to the web via wifi or mobile data (i.e. cellular data connection over Verizon networks).   The cellular does not require a contract and seems a good alternative when wifi is unavailable.
  2. Cons
  • It’s not a general purpose computer. While I can do most of what I do on a computer, I can’t accomplish every task.   I can surf the web including watching flash videos, YouTube, Hulu, Pandora radio, email, download and open PDF documents (except password protected ones).   I can create, edit and share documents using Google docs or Microsoft OfficeLive.  I can upload photos to Picasa or Flickr and do some photo editing using online apps.   I can’t run general purpose CAD software or Photoshop.   I can’t unzip file archives without first uploading them to the cloud.   I can’t mount a Windows shared drive or NAS (network accessible storage) drive on my network.
  • Printing requires assistance. Printing is though CloudPrint.  That is, print jobs are submitted over the web to a computer running the CloudPrint server software or to a CloudPrint compatible networked printer (e.g. HP ePrint capable printers).  In my case, I wanted to continue using my 10-year old laser printer, so I run Cloudprint on my Windows desktop connected to the laser printer.   Were the Chromebook my only computer, I’d need to buy a compatible printer.
  • Web and Google dependence. This may be a big issue for some, but I think there is reasonable flexibility in sourcing services.   Email can be set up through other providers, as can document storage.   It’s even possible to set up local cloud storage with stand-alone disk drives and devices like Tonido plug — a compact cloud server used in concert with off-the-shelf usb drives.  Though I’ve connected thumbdrives to the Chromebook, I’ve not tried a usb harddrive connected directly.    Web dependence would be a problem for dial-up users, though mobile data could provide an alternative (albeit a relatively expensive alternative).

In conclusion, I feel the Chromebook is well suited to a huge population of computer users.

  1. It is attractive to those who use computers but don’t want to be bothered by the details of how they work.   In this respect, I think it rivals Apple’s offerings in providing technology that “just works”.  No geek required to install drivers or fix crashes or install add-ons.
  2. It is attractive to IT departments and household geeks because it minimises the need for user support.
  3. It is “super simple” to transition PC and Mac users who have experience with the Chrome browser, because the Chromebook experience is nearly identical to the experience of using the Chrome browser.   To that point, there is no need for a Chromebook to do anything you can’t do on a PC or Mac within Chrome brower (which includes using apps from the Chrome Web Store).  The reasons for the Chromebook are security, reliability, and long battery life on well designed and executed hardware.

Supporting these conclusions is the fact that I have, in the course of the past seven months, used the Chromebook,  my Windows desktop, Windows on my laptop, Linux on my laptop, my wife’s Apple PowerBook and Linux via dual boot on the Chromebook, and yet I come back to Chrome OS on the Chromebook for the best experience.   My main reasons for ever booting another computer are:

  1. To watch Netflix — which is promised for Chromebook users in the future by Netflix but not yet available;
  2. To make a remote desktop connection locally.   This is much quicker than using remote desktop over the internet — the latter is possible on the Chromebook.
  3. To unzip a file archive I receive via email or download from a web site — e.g. my photo gallery allows me to download my photos, but only packaged in zip archives.

Draw your own conclusions   Test drive a “virtual Chromebook” on your PC, Mac or Linux machine by installing the Google Chrome browser.   See if you can live totally inside the Chrome browser and store everything you want on the web.  Whenever you’re tempted to launch another application, check the Chrome Web Store and see if there is a solution that works inside Chrome Browser.  Whenever you want to save something, look to the cloud for a place to store it.  Then, imagine doing that on a lightweight notebook with incredible battery life and near zero maintenance.   Oh, and I didn’t mention the Chromebook boots in about 15 seconds from the powered off state (instantaneously from sleep state).

For the counterpoint to this review see Whatever you do, don’t buy a Chromebook.   I obviously disagree.   In my view, my computers are very uninteresting devices when not connected to the web.   We live on the web today.   That’s a fact for most of us.

Scary Small / Scary Fast Linux

Tuesday, July 5th, 2011

Check out xPUD.

A Test Post from iOS

Sunday, June 5th, 2011

Just seeing how this works. Please excuse me.

20110605-120012.jpg

Interesting Insights on the WWW

Monday, May 16th, 2011

It’s a little scary that we may, over time, become so isolated, because web sites are customizing the content they offer up based on individual behaviors.  We can then each become ignorant of perspectives different from our own.

Installed Ubuntu 11.04 on the Cr-48

Tuesday, May 3rd, 2011

I like it!  Unity desktop is a little different, but everything is running quickly and looking great.

This is Pretty Cool — High Resolution (Time & Space) Time Lapses

Sunday, May 1st, 2011

Windows Update

Wednesday, March 30th, 2011

Since re-installing Windows Vista on my laptop a few weeks ago, I’ve begun to think that Microsoft might have turned the corner.   I see that among the numerous updates since the installation, “Microsoft Security Essentials” is now included.   It is handling “Realtime Protection” (whatever that is) and virus detection.   It’s about time that Microsoft took this vital function back in house.   I suspect that 3rd party solutions were a big part of the stability and performance problems I’ve encountered when using Windows.  As of this writing, I’m satisfied with Vista’s performance — sometimes surprised to find that I’m using it.   I plan to investigate whether MSE can be installed on my WinXP desktop.   That’s about it for now.

Insanity Strikes

Friday, March 11th, 2011

insane: one who does the same thing again and again while expecting different outcomes (aka: Me).

To explain, I installed Windows Vista on my laptop (for the “ump-teenth” time). I’m too cheap to upgrade to Windows7 ($119 for the least expensive upgrade), and I keep hoping that Microsoft will take pity and FIX Vista.

It’s been a while since I immersed myself in computing, and the ChromeOS netbook (Cr-48) was feeling a little constraining . . . having to set up a private “cloud” server on our XP desktop to archive files; needing to use remote desktop to the desktop to unzip the morning paper; not being able to make quick edits of photos before uploading to our web album; needing a Windows or Mac to print (at least until ChromeOS printers become available).

However, after a day-long series of Windows updates and a dozen or so reboots (many of which would not complete without intervention) I again see the beauty in an OS that maintains itself without my participation. Even if I screw up and have to restore the system entirely, it only takes about 15 minutes, and all my data (bookmarks, passwords, documents) are still available on the “cloud”.

While not as capable as OSX (the other hands-off OS), ChromeOS does most of what I need to do — without 3rd party anti-virus programs; backup software or manual backup sessions; buying, installing and updating office suites.

My OS preferences:
1) Ubuntu (or other Linux distribution) — I also installed it and updated it yesterday (in about an hour);
2) OSX (up to one per household);
3) ChromeOS (with pre-existing OSX or Windows XP);
4) Windows (if I’m feeling the need to punish myself yet again).

Switch to our mobile site


Larry and Marty Steidl